CASE NAME: VIJAY SINGH RATHORE VS. MURARILAL & ORS.
PETITIONER: VIJAY SINGH RATHORE
RESPONDENT: MURARILAL & ORS
BENCH: V. R. KRISHNA IYER (J), D.A. DESAI (J), ANAND DEV KOSHAL (J)
CITATION: AIR, 1979 SC 1719
LAWS INVOLVED : Bar Council of India Rules,1975: Rule 10, Chapter II, Part 6, An Advocate should not stand a Surety, or certify the soundness of a surety for his client required for the purpose of any legal proceedings.
The Advocates Act, 1961:
Section 35 Punishment of advocates for misconduct.
FACTS:
The Appellant was practicing lawyer of 21 years of
age. He has improperly certified the solvency of surety for the accused, who
was his client in a bailable offence. A complaint was filed u/s 35 of The
Advocate Act,1961 before The Bar Council of India on the ground that there was
violation of Bar Council of India Rules, 1975, Part 6 Chapter II Rule 3.
ISSUES:
Whether a lawyer can certify the solvency of
surety or certify the soundness to his client for the purpose of any legal
proceedings?
JUDGEMENT:
The
Supreme Court held that, in this case the Appellant Lawyer was young (Age 21
yrs.) and the offence was not tainted with turpitude and surety, whose solvency
he certified, was found to be good. The Court considered the facts and
circumstances and substituted the punishment of suspension with public
reprimand and directed that he shall not violate the norm of professional
conduct and shall uphold the purity and probity of the profession generally.
Supreme Court
held that public admonition is an appropriate sentence in the present case and
proceed to administer in open court.
Pictorial Presentation of Vijay Singh Rathore v. Murarilal and others (1979) - YouTube
No comments:
Post a Comment