Showing posts with label Article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Article. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 March 2023

Article 24 Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc

 


Article 24  Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc

No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment

Debate Summary

Article 18, Draft Constitution, 1948

No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment.

 

Draft Article 18 (Article 24) was debated on 3rd December 1948.

 

One member moved an amendment to protect women from being employed ‘at night, in mines or in industries detrimental to their health’. This was supported by a member who pointed out that similar protections existed in all progressive countries. However, the Assembly rejected the amendment.

 

The Draft Article was adopted on 3rd December 1948.


Reference

Constitution of India  



Article 23 Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour.

 


Article 23 Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour.

(1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

 

(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them

Debate Summary

Article 17, Draft Constitution, 1948

(1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes. In imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on the ground of race, religion, caste or class.

 

Draft Article 17 (Article 23) was debated in the Assembly on 3rd December 1948. It prohibited human trafficking and forced labour.

 

It was proposed that in addition to the specific mention of ‘begar’, the Article also make mention of ‘devadasi’ – the social practice of dedicating young women to temples which amounted to trafficking. In response, a member argued that this practice could be wiped out through ordinary legislation; moreover, public opinion had already mobilized against the practice. Further, he contended that the Draft Article was intended to apply only to social practices which had the support of vested interests. This amendment was rejected.

 

One member wanted to provide for compensation for individuals performing compulsory service. The Chairman of the Drafting Committee argued that this was unnecessary since such service may not impact the ability of a person to earn their livelihood. This amendment was later withdrawn.

 

The Draft Article was adopted with a minor amendment on 3rd December 1948.


Reference 

Constitution of India

Article 22 Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases.

 

Article 22  Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases.


(1) No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice.

 

(2) Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.

 

(3) Nothing in clauses (1) and (2) shall apply—

 

(a) to any person who for the time being is an enemy alien; or

(b) to any person who is arrested or detained under any law providing for preventive detention.

 

(4) No law providing for preventive detention shall authorise the detention of a person for a longer period than three months unless—

 

(a) an Advisory Board consisting of persons who are, or have been, or are qualified to be appointed as, Judges of a High Court has reported before the expiration of the said period of three months that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for such detention:

Provided that nothing in this sub-clause shall authorise the detention of any person beyond the maximum period prescribed by any law made by Parliament under sub-clause (b) of clause (7); or

(b) such person is detained in accordance with the provisions of any law made by Parliament under subclauses (a) and (b) of clause (7).

 

(5) When any person is detained in pursuance of an order made under any law providing for preventive detention, the authority making the order shall, as soon as may be, communicate to such person the grounds on which the order has been made and shall afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order.

 

(6) Nothing in clause (5) shall require the authority making any such order as is referred to in that clause to disclose facts which such authority considers to be against the public interest to disclose.

 

(7) Parliament may by law prescribe—


(a) the circumstances under which, and the class or classes of cases in which, a person may be detained for a period longer than three months under any law providing for preventive detention without obtaining the opinion of an Advisory Board in accordance with the provisions of sub-clause (a) of clause (4);

(b) the maximum period for which any person may in any class or classes of cases be detained under any law providing for preventive detention; and

(c) the procedure to be followed by an Advisory Board in an inquiry under sub-clause (a) of clause (4).

Debate Summary

Draft Article 15A was debated on 15th and 16th September 1949. It was not part of the Draft Constitution, 1948. Instead, the Chairman of the Drafting Committee proposed to insert the following as Draft Article 15A:

'15A. (1) No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult a legal practitioner of his choice.

(2) Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.

(3) Nothing in this article shall apply-

(a) to any person who for the time being is an enemy alien; or

(b) to any person who is arrested under any law providing for preventive detention;

Provided that nothing in sub-clause (b) of clause (3) of this article shall permit the detention of a person for a longer period than three months unless-

(a) an Advisory Board consisting of persons who are or have been or are qualified to be appointed as judges of a High Court has reported before the expiration of the said period of three months that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for such detention, or

(b) such person is detained in accordance with the provisions of any law made by Parliament under clause (4) of this article.

 (4) Parliament may by law prescribe the circumstances under which and the class or classes of cases in which a person who is arrested under any law providing for preventive detention may be detained for a period longer than three months and also the maximum period for which any such person may be so detained.’

 

The Draft Article provided safeguards for arrested or detained persons, and also carved out exceptions for persons subject to preventive detention.

 

The Chairman of the Drafting Committee stated that Draft Article 15A was introduced to compensate for dropping ‘due process’ from Draft Article 15 (Article 21). He declared this new Draft Article turned statutory safeguards for detainees into constitutional guarantees, thereby protecting personal liberty from arbitrary action.

 

Some members felt the Draft Article did not go far enough. One proposed a series of amendments, one of which gave the accused the right to be defended by a lawyer of their choice. He argued that this was necessary to bring the Draft Article in line with the existing statutory provisions. This was accepted by the Assembly.

 

Other members were concerned about the lack of safeguards for preventively detained persons. Several wanted to reduce the permissible time period for this detention, to periods ranging from two months to fifteen days to twenty four hours. One member wanted to extend the right to be informed of grounds for one’s arrest to such detainees, arguing that this would restrain police officers from indiscriminately arresting people. All of these amendments were rejected by the Assembly.

 

Members pointed out that the provisions relating to the Advisory Board were vague and did not contain guidelines for its functioning or safeguards for the rights of detained persons. In response to these concerns, the Chairman proposed to amend clause (4) to give Parliament the power to frame laws setting out the procedure to be followed by the Advisory Board. This was accepted by the Assembly.

 

The amended Draft Article was adopted on 16th September 1949.



Reference 

Article 21 A Right to education


The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine.

Debate Summary

This provision was not included in the Constitution of India, 1950. It was inserted by the Constitution (Eighty Sixth Amendment) Act, 2010.



Reference

Article 21 Protection of life and personal liberty.


 

Article 21 Protection of life and personal liberty.

No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

Debate Summary

Article 15, Draft Constitution, 1948

No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law, nor shall any person be denied equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

 

Draft Article 15 was debated in the Constituent Assembly on 6th and 13th December, 1948. It provided for the right to life and personal liberty, subject to procedure established by law; it also gave all persons equality before the law.

 

Members were divided on whether the term ‘procedure established by law’ should be replaced with ‘due process’. Some argued that ‘procedure established by law’ allowed the legislature to pass laws which violated an individuals civil liberties. If the term ‘due process’ was adopted instead, the judiciary would have the right to protect these liberties by investigating whether a law was consistent with the other fundamental rights. However, others argued that ‘due process’ allowed the unelected judges, who themselves are not immune from prejudice, to undermine the authority of the legislature by passing judgment of lawfully-enacted legislation. Ultimately, the members chose to retain the phrase ‘procedure established by law’.

 

The second part of the Draft Article, relating to equality before the law, was not debated. Later, the Drafting Committee decided to move this part into a standalone Article 14.

 

Draft Article 15 was passed without amendments on 13th December 1949.

 

Reference 

Constitution of India

Review and Feedback

Featured Post

Happy New Year 2025